The below was endorsed by Robert Malone, one of the inventors of the mRNA technology behind the vaccines.

Title: Acceptable Reasons for Vaccine Hesitance w/ 50 Published papers
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:01:50 +0300

Covinfo Data Dump:-

The current Covid19 vaccines have several problems with 9 main areas of interest:

  • the spike protein appears to be cytotoxic.
  • the emergence of immune escape variants.
  • the potential for antibody dependent enhancement.
  • the potential for autoimmune disorders.
  • the narrow design focus of the vaccines.
  • the fact that alternative treatments are available to both prevent and treat
    covid.
  • they are trying to jab everyone, even people who have recovered from covid
    and do not need the jab.
  • there are a growing number of severe reactions to the vaccines but this fact
    gets very little coverage in the press and sometimes it even gets outright
    censorship.
  • the potential for long term unknown side effects and the potential impact of
    this on national security.

I will present a brief overview of each issue and then provide scientific data
below for support (except for 9. which is more a discussion based on a logical
assessment of future risk).

1. The spike protein of the virus, that is also being utilized in the vaccines,
is damaging to our cells through 3 mechanisms. The first is that when the spike
protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the ACE2 to send signals to the
mitochondria within the cell which destroys the mitochondria, eventually killing
the cell. The second is that when the spike protein binds to our ACE2 receptors
it causes the ACE2 to send signals to other cells which increases the amount of
pro-inflammatory agents in the blood. This inflammation damages the tissues. The
third way is that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 of the platelets in
our blood, it causes them to clot. Now, the vaccine manufacturers did take steps
to make the spike protein more safe. The spike protein has two parts an S1
subunit and an S2 subunit. The S1 is the part that connects to the ACE2, and the
S2 is the part that opens up like a knife stabbing the membrane and facilitates
fusion between the membrane of the cell and the envelope of the virus. With the
vaccines, they modified the S2 subnit so that it could not open up and jab into
the cell membranes if it connects with any ACE2 receptors. They thought this
would make the spike protein safe, but this assumption is false and if they had
taken the time to do more research before rushing to production they would have
found that out. It may seem like the jabby bit is what damages the cells, but
actually the major damage is caused by the S1 connecting to the ACE2 receptor.
Just the S1, by itself without the S2, causes the ACE2 receptor to start the
cell signaling processes that cause the mitochondrial damage, the
pro-inflammatory response, and the blood clots.

Studies on the spike protein:-

How the virus uses the spike protein to enter human cells:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-y

Article on how the Covid19 spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier: https:
//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612030406X?via%3Dihub

Japanese article on how the Pfizer vax is associated with brain hemorrhaging
(lending credence to the hypothesis that the spike proteins are crossing the
blood brain barrier in some people):
https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40545-021-00326-7

Article on how AstraZeneca is associated with blood clots in the brain (lending
more credence to the hypothesis that the spike proteins are crossing the blood
brain barrier in some people):
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840

Article on how the Covid19 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor of our
platelets to cause bloodclots:
https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-020-00954-7

Article explaining that blood clots from the spike protein interacting with our
platelets are associated with both COVID-19 infection and vaccination: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003648

Article explains that just the S1 subunit of the spike protein can cause
platelets to clot:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.21252960v1

Article with evidence that spike proteins do end up circulating in the blood,
when they’re not supposed to, they’re supposed to be anchored on the cell
membranes:
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075

More evidence that spike proteins do not stay on the cell membranes but end up
circulating in the blood. This study aims to explain the blood clots caused by
the J&J and AstraZeneca adenovector vaccines, they claim that the DNA isn’t
properly spliced and the spike proteins end up in the blood causing thrombosis
when the spikes attach to the ACE2 receptors of the endothelial cells:
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1

Article on how the spike protein can cause neurodegeneration: https://www.scienc
edirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X2100499X?via%3Dihub

Journal article with evidence that the spike protein by itself can damage cells
by binding to ACE2, causing the cells mitochondria to lose their shape and break
apart: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902

Article on how the spike protein in vaccines can cause cell damage via cell
signaling: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827936/

Article that when the spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor it causes the
release of soluble IL-6R which acts as a extracellular signal which causes
inflammation (see the first paper for evidence that the spike causes the release
of IL-6R and see the second paper for an explanation of how soluble IL-6R causes
pro-inflammatory extracellular signaling:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33284859/ And
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491447/

Another article that Spike protein from covid or the vaccine causes inflammation
through cell signaling, this time there is evidence that the spike protein
causes senescence (premature aging) signals in the cell which attracts
leukocytes that cause inflammation of the cell:
https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JVI.00794-21

Spike protein by itself causes cell damage by eliciting a pro-inflammatory
response: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-021-01332-z

Bio-distribution data:-

Pfizer animal testing document that was obtained by Dr. Byram Bridle through a
FOI request to the Japanese government which shows the bio=distribution of the
lipid-nano particles throughout the bodies and organs of the test subjects. This
is evidence that the lipid nanoparticles do not stay in the injection site, but
instead travel all throughout the body (go to page 16/23 for the charts showing
bio=distribution over the course of 48hrs):
https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf

Addendum to the above link. This blog post provides easy to understand
information (with pictures) on the make-up of the lipid nanoparticles used in
the Covid19 vaccines. It shows that the pharmaceutical companies could have
designed them to have targeting ligands on the outside, so that the
nanoparticles would only transfect the muscle cells. But instead the vax was
designed with PEG polymers on the outside, so that the immune system will not be
able to pick them up and put them in the trash. The PEG is what Byram Bridle
says is the reason the vaccine travels throughout the body and since it does not
have targeting ligands, it can transfect any type of cell: https://www.cas.org/resource/blog/understanding-nanotechnology-covid-19-vaccines

2. Vaccine enhanced immune escape occurs when a poorly designed or weak vaccine
helps create new variants. This happens in the exact same way as antibiotic
resistance and regular old evolution. In the case of evolution, if you want to
make an organism stronger, you put it under evolutionarily unfavorable
conditions. This way you kill all the weak examples of the organism and just
leave the strong ones. If you want to create heat resistant bacteria, put a
petri dish full of the bacteria under moderately high heat that kills 99% of the
bacteria. Save the 1% that were able to survive the heat, allow them to grow,
and repeat the process over and over again while turning up the heat just a
little each time. Do this until you have a population of bacteria that are all
extremely heat resistant. The same process occurs with antibiotic resistance.
When you only take half your meds, you kill 99% of the bacteria and you leave
only the 1% that were slightly more resistant to the drugs and now they
flourish. Before they were a small part of the population but you changed the
conditions of their environment so that they have the advantage. You’ve killed
all the normal bacteria that the mutant variants had to compete with so that now
the antibiotic resistant bacteria are the alpha strain that have unlimited
resources and so surge in population to take over your body. Well, the same
thing happens with viruses and vaccines.

If you produce a vaccine that elicits a weak immune response, you are creating
an unfavorable environment for the virus. This will kill the weak 99%, and leave
those 1% of mutant virus particles that are not as hindered by the antibodies
produced by the vaccine. Whereas before these mutants were only a tiny part of
the population and would have been unlikely to transmit on to the next person.
Now these mutant virus particles surge in number because they no longer have to
compete with the other virus particles and your bodies defenses do not work.
They are now highly likely to transmit on to the next person, whereas before
they would not have been able to leave the host in which the mutation occured.
In terms of creating variants, the current covid vaccines are very bad for three
reasons. First, some vaccine manufacturers require two shots and now also
boosters because the first shot produces a very weak immune response. Second,
the vaccines are very leaky. Even after you have gotten a full immune response
from both shots, you can still get and transmit the virus onto others. Well,
which virus particles are likely to get passed on by a fully vaccinated person?
Clearly they will be those virus particles that have the ability to multiply
quickly while avoiding the antibodies produced by the vaccines. This will create
very virulent and antibody resistant variants. Watch for these variants in the
news as time goes on, we’re already seeing things like Delta, Lambda, Eplsion,
etc.

As we implement boosters, they will start to come at faster and faster rates,
and over time data scientists will start to see timed correlations between the
implementation of mass boosters and the emergence of new strains. Third, the
vaccines do seem to help reduce the severity of the disease when people are
infected (although this may change as new variants emerge). Why would this be a
concern? Well, because of the leakiness of the vaccines we just spoke about. If
you have very low symptoms but you can still get and transmit the virus, then
you won’t even realize that you’re sick and you’ll be spreading the virus to
even more people as an asymptomatic carrier. So, these vaccines will only
increase transmission by creating more and more asymptomatic carriers (although
this may not be a bad thing, if everyone in the world gets the virus and
everyone is asymptomatic, then there’s really no need to care about covid
anymore. But this is an unrealistic idealization that is unlikely to occur, some
people will still get sick and die or suffer long haul covid). One additional
point to address here is the claim that the unvaccinated are causing the
emergence of new vaccine resistant variants. Let me be clear, the unvaccinated
absolutely have the ability to facilitate the creation of new variants. However,
it would require a statistically enormous number of people to get the virus
before they could produce a new variant by chance. This is because a mutant
virus particle will only make up a small portion of the virus population inside
a person’s body.

Therefore, it is highly unlikely that this particular particle will be able to
spread to a new person. Whereas, in the vaccinated, their weak immune response
specifically selects for the mutant variants. It is highly likely that if a
vaccinated person passes on the virus to another person, the particles they pass
on will be those that have the ability to escape from the immune response
elicited by the vaccines. An analogy would be if you did an experiment with 500
room temperature petri dishes filled with bacteria and 500 heated petri dishes
with bacteria, then found a heat resistant variant but didn’t know which dish it
came from. It would be absurd to think that the heat resistant strain of
bacteria came from the room temperature petri dishes. It would possible, sure,
but completely improbable that the heat resistant strain had suddenly appeared
in a room temp petri dish. There would be no reason for it to become a dominant
strain in that environment. Logically, statistically, and evolutionarily, it
must have come from the heated petri dishes. This is a very basic and obvious
conclusion, but the media and government bureaucrats in lab coats are trying to
tell you that the absurd thing is true. They’re trying to say that the
unvaccinated (the room temperature petri dishes) are where the vaccine resistant
strains are coming from.

Vaccine Enhanced Immune Escape:-

Evidence of cov2 immune escape:
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2021/06/30/science.abi7994

Article from 2015 that explains how imperfect vaccination (like the Pfizer and
moderna that require at least two shots to be effective) can create immune
escape variants: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/articleid=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198

Article from 2021 explains that unless vaccination is done quickly, there will
be a high probability of escape mutants:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95025-3

3. There is a potential for ADE, antibody dependent enhancement. This is when
the virus mutates so that the antibodies no longer neutralize the virus but the
antibodies still try to attach to it. This can actually help the virus get into
your immune cells because when the virus is covered with antibodies it will draw
macrophages to the virus that will try to eat it. However, when your macrophages
come to eat the virus particle that they think has been neutralized, the virus
gets inside them and starts replicating because the antibodies actually didn’t
neutralize the virus. Your own antibodies act like a kind of Trojan Horse.
Another way that ADE can happen is your own antibodies connect to the receptors
of your cells and actually help the virus get in directly. This was a huge
problem with the Dengue vaccine and we need to do a lot of testing to make sure
this isn’t a possibility. Clearly with these rushed vaccines we haven’t
eliminated this possibility and with the virus mutating, ADE may pop up with a
later variant. We must stay vigilant and keep an eye out for this signal. It
will manifest as people with high antibody levels being more likely to get sick
and die.

Antibody Dependent Enhancement:-

Journal article from 2005 shows evidence that sars-cov1 vaccine, that also
focused on the spike protein, caused ADE when subjects were challenged with
different strain: https://www.nature.com/articles/news050110-3#ref-CR1

Article explaining how ADE works in Sar-cov1:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8

Article explaining the potential for ADE in Covid19:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8

Another article that speculates on the potential for ADE in Covid19:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32920233/

Article from 2021 explains that there is evidence that covid19 is able to kill
macrophages by using antibody dependent mechanisms:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.22.432407v1

4. There is a potential for an autoimmune response from the vaccines. The
vaccines that were developed for Sars-Cov-1 used the spike protein, just like
the vaccines for Sars-Cov-2. Unfortunately, those vaccines caused the animals to
develop serious autoimmune disorders and they ended up causing severe organ
damage. There is a question about whether these new vaccines, which also focus
on the spike protein, will also cause autoimmune disorders. The problem is that
autoimmune disorders take time to develop and to show up. It may also take a
long time before doctors and scientists can link the sudden rise in autoimmune
disorders with these vaccines. Usually, in a vaccine trial you closely monitor
your trial group for years and years. This allows you to identify the signals.
With the current program of injecting millions of people, there will be no clear
way to link causation to the vaccines and an increase in autoimmune disorders
may just fly under the radar. We may not know for a very long time or never.
Another concern is that because of the way the mRNA vaccines work, they cause
your own cells to present as foreign entities. Your immune system comes over and
starts killing your own cells. This has never been done before in human history.
We have no idea if there will be long term consequences for this and whether
this will lead to autoimmune disorders.

Research results of past vaccines for sars-cov1 that used the spike protein:-

Journal article from 2004 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that
also focused on the spike protein: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2004/12/sars-vaccine-linked-liver-damage-ferret-study

Journal article from 2005 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that
also focused on the spike protein: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15755610/

Journal article from 2012 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov1 vaccine that
also focused on the spike protein:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/articleid=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421

Journal article from 2020 on autoimmune disorders from Sars-cov vaccine (can’t
figure out if they’re talking about cov1 or 2):
https://jvi.asm.org/content/78/22/12672.abstract

Journal article from 2020 explains why immune disorders happen with covid vax,
because human and Covid19 proteins are similar:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186

5. The mRNA vaccines are narrowly focused on just the spike protein when they
could have been designed to target more proteins. The Covid19 coronavirus has 4
main proteins. There are 3 on its outside and 1 on the inside. The S-protein,
the M-protein, and the E-protein, are on the outside, while the N-protein is on
the inside. When you get a natural infection your body will likely produce
antibodies for all or most of these proteins (depending on the function of your
own unique immune system). We knew from studying Sars-Cov-1 that antibodies to
the S-protein and the M-protein are both neutralizing. In fact, they used
exactly that knowledge when they designed the current vaccines. So, they could
have tried to make vaccines that utilize the M-protein to avoid the potential
for autoimmune disorders discussed above. But they didn’t, they instead focused
only on the S-protein. They could have designed the vaccines so that they
present both the S-protein and the M-protein. This would have made the vaccines
much more effective and less leaky since any mutated virus particles would have
to have mutated both the S-protein and the M-protein to avoid the antibodies.
Whereas, the current vaccines are narrowly focused on just the S-protein,
meaning that the virus only has to mutate the one protein. It is exponentially
harder for an organism to mutate two beneficial traits vs just mutating one
beneficial trait. So, these vaccines are worse than they could have been.

Vaccine efficacy:-

Article explains how vaccine manufacturers have used relative risk reduction to
determine that vaccine efficacy is ~90+%, however they should have used absolute
risk reduction which would tell us that the vaccines will only reduce total
covid cases by ~1%: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext

Addendum to the above information. This video from 2013 explains the difference
between relative and absolute risk reduction in a very simple way:
https://www.youtube.com/watchv=7K30MGvOs5s&ab_channel=TerryShaneyfelt

Article from 2005 explains that antibodies to the S-protein and the M-protein
are effective in neutralizing the sars-cov1 virus. However, the sars-cov2
vaccines only target the S-protein. This is evidence that the vaccine
manufacturers could have chosen to make a superior mrna vax that produced two
types of antibodies, but chose to focus narrowly on just the S-protein:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16544518/

Antibodies from vaccines start to drop within 6 months, get ready for endless
boosters: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03777-9

6. There are alternative treatments that are effective against Covid19 but they
are being suppressed. Why? Because the vaccines are not approved by the FDA but
instead they are emergency use authorized only. The emergency use authorization
can only be granted if “there are no adequate, approved, and available
alternatives”. Well, a growing body of scientific research is showing that both
Ivermectin and Fluvoxamine (among other drugs) are adequate alternatives for
early treatment of Covid19, and both of these drugs have been FDA approved for
years. Unfortunately, that means they are now off patent and no one can make any
money off of them. So, for the vaccines to continue to receive their EUA, the
existence of these treatments must be suppressed. We have seen a huge amount of
censorship of doctors who have been speaking out about these drugs.

Ivermectin:-

Emergency use authorization for the vaccines cannot be granted if there are
effective alternative approved treatments for Covid19. So, if the pharmaceutical
industry is going to make any money off covid, they must suppress the existence
of any existing off patent drugs that may be effective in treating or preventing
covid: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization

Meta-analysis on the efficacy of Ivermectin in treating Covid19: https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Abstract/9000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial shows that Ivermectin is
able to cure covid within 6 days for most people:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1

More evidence that Ivermectin treatment leads to much faster recovery from
Covid19: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.26880

An NIH study reveals that a five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of
COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/

Ivermectin stops replication of covid:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011

Ivermectin has anti-viral properties:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888155/

Ivermectin has anti-viral properties against covid:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-020-0336-

Ivermectin binds to Covid19 proteins to block the virus:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996102/

Evidence that Ivermectin can be effective as a prophylaxis, Argentinian
frontline healthcare workers were given Ivermectin as a preventative and zero
got sick with covid, whereas 58.2% of the control group who did not take
Ivermectin got covid: https://www.buongiornosuedtirol.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Nota-Journal-of-Biomedical-Research-Safety-and-Efficacy-IotaCarrageenan-and-Ivermectin.pdf

Ivermectin safe to give 12mg per day for 5 days:
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712%2820%2932506-6/fulltext

Ivermectin safely administered 60mg per day for 6 months:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10428194.2020.1786559

Fluvoxamine:-

Fluvoxamine helps in covid treatment:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33180097/

Covid leads to long term inflammation, useful for long haul Covid19 treatment:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33391730/

Fluvoxamine has anti-inflammatory properties that can help treat covid:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.652688/full

Fluvoxamine targets sigma-1 to stop covid replication:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33403480/

7. We’ve known for decades that once you are infected with a virus or disease,
your body creates a robust immune response, including memory T cells and B
cells. These cells stick around so that you can quickly respond to a new
infection. However, this fact is being completely ignored by vaccine pushers,
they want a needle in every arm, even in the arms of those who do not need it,
like the covid recovered. We might say, well covid is new and different, and
perhaps immunity wanes after a time. This assumption was prudent in the
beginning of the pandemic but now we have lots of evidence that the covid
recovered have a near zero chance of getting sick again. Your body takes a few
weeks and months to build up its antibodies after an infection. Most of the time
the second infection takes place during this time frame. There is no reason to
force every covid recovered patient to take an experimental drug, especially
after that initial 3 month period after they have build up a sufficient immune
response. If you still think that the miniscule chance that their immune system
has failed makes them a danger, then why are these people not asked for proof of
antibodies. It’s because they don’t actually care if you have antibodies. The
vaccinated, without knowing whether they have antibodies or not, can walk around
free, but a covid recovered patient, with proof of antibodies is still
considered a danger. It’s ass backwards and it is evidence that vax pushers
don’t actually care about immunity. It is just about getting a needle into every
arm. The reason why they are doing this, I do not know I leave it up to you, but
it doesn’t make sense and I make a point of not going along with things that
don’t make sense.

Studies on covid recovered:-

No benefit from vaccination of previously infected individuals:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v2

Covid19 infection produces long lasting immunity:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03647-4

Second article that covid19 infection produces life long immunity:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01442-9

More evidence that covid19 infection produces long term immunity:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.19.21255739v1

Study of 600,000 covid recovered patients finds less than 1% reinfection rate
over 10 months and an almost 0% risk in the first 7 months:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209951/pdf/RMV-9999-e2260.pdf

8. There is a growing amount of data that people are having severe reactions to
the vaccines. It gets little to no coverage in the press, in some cases people
who talk about their reactions on social media are being censored and called
anti-vaxxers (I mean, how asinine to call someone who took the jab an
anti-vaxxer) or fakers (I am sure some are faking for money/attention, but I
highly doubt it’s many of them given the social consequences for lying). Some
senators have done press conferences with these people so they can tell their
stories. There are publicly accessible government databases which contain
reports of people who have had adverse reactions to the vaccines. These systems
were put in place in the 90’s to act as a sort of early warning system and to
give transparency to the public after previous botched vaccine rollouts like the
1976 swine flu vaccine debacle. You can go and read these reports for yourself.
There are websites that download the reports and present them to the public in a
very readable manner (the government website from the 90’s is not very good).
There are concerns that these reports are being made in error or by bad actors.
However, research has been done into these systems and it was found that more
than 80% of the adverse reactions had seemingly no other cause or explanation
aside from the vaccine. In the past, if a vaccine hit 50 deaths or a few hundred
adverse reactions on these reporting systems, they would shutdown the
vaccination program. As of writing this, for the covid vaccines the deaths are
into the thousands and the serious adverse reactions are into the hundreds of
thousands. Yet they just keep rolling with the shots and now are even forcibly
mandating the shot.

VAERS:-

Analysis on the VAERS death data shows that in 86% of reports the vaccine cannot
be ruled out as a causal factor in the death of the patient: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Results_and_Analysis

Addendum to the above link. OpenVAERS is a site that allows you to easily read
VAERS reports and breaks down the numbers. The reports seem to be a lot of
people who have comorbidities or are old, but there are also some really eye
opening cases where young people experience horrible side effects. Read for
yourself and make up your own mind about what the vax is doing to your fellow
Americans: https://www.openvaers.com/openvaers

9. Criminals are innocent until proven guilty, but medical drugs are not like
criminals, medical drugs are guilty until proven innocent. Pharmaceutical
companies must prove the innocence of their medications through long term
testing. Doctors, bureaucrats, and the public seem to have forgotten this fact
when they mandate a new technology to be injected into us without long term
testing to prove the innocence of the drug. The vaccine may have completely
unknown and serious side effects that manifest in a majority of the people only
in the long term. So, the vax may appear to be safe in the short term, but in
the long run it causes severe harm or even death. It is extremely risky to
innoculate the entire population if we don’t know what the long term effects may
be. It is especially risky to vax our critical workers with an experimental drug
about which we know nothing in the long term. If it turns out that within 2
years of taking it, the vaccine causes the debilitation of a large portion of
the people who took it and we had forced all our healthcare professionals to
take it, then our countries will lose a large portion of their healthcare
professionals. This would devastate our society’s ability to treat the sick and
cause massive death and suffering. Same goes for the military. If we vax all our
fighters, and the vax turns out to greatly physically or mentally weaken most of
the people who took it, there goes our ability to defend ourselves. We won’t be
able to fight off any aggressors and will lose years of military experience as
we will have to re-train a whole new set of recruits without the previous
military leaders. If most of the laborers are vaxxed and the vax causes bodily
weakness, then they won’t be able to go to work and our production falls to
zero. Without domestic production, we would have to rely on foreign imports but
the economy would also grind to a halt so the nation would have no money to pay
for these imports. This would probably be a death stroke for whatever nation was
victim to it. So, force vaccinating critical workers, or even a large portion of
the menial labor force, is a massive national security risk. We also have no way
of calculating how large the percentage of risk is since we know nothing at all
about the long term effects of inoculation with this type of technology. This
could utterly destroy any highly vaxxed nations. This outcome would be so bad
(total collapse of a society’s infrastructure) that only a massive amount of
safety data could justify inoculating the entire population with any treatment.
But we just don’t have that safety data for these experimental drugs right now,
and will probably not have it for decades to come. By then, it will be too late
to do anything about it. You can fry an egg, but you can’t unfry it. Just the
same, you won’t be able to unvax the population, there’s no way to get the vax
out of the body once it’s in. The solution is to only vax the old and vulnerable
at risk populations and not vax everyone. This issue worries me deeply since
there must be risk responsive people at high levels of government who must
understand and be sensitive to this type of national security risk. Yet, these
people are either being completely ignored or they are allowing the government
to proceed with the risky mass vaccination programs anyway.

Separately, these 9 issues would be a concern. But put together, they are
incredibly alarming. To me, something feels very wrong here. You too may have
already felt it in your gut or in the back of your mind or when reading this.
That feeling that something is wrong is instinct, it is the product of millions
of years of evolution. A gift from our ancestors who also saw something that was
wrong in their environment and had this weird bad feeling. They acted on it and
it saved them. So they were able to pass on that instinct to their off-spring
from generation to generation. Now, after millions of years, it finds its way to
you. If you feel what I feel, that something is very wrong here, I implore you:

Do not ignore it.

Links:
[2]: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-y (link)
[3]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612030406X?via%3Dihub (link)
[4]: https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40545-021-00326-7 (link)
[5]: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840 (link)
[6]: https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-020-00954-7 (link)
[7]: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003648 (link)
[8]: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.21252960v1 (link)
[9]: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075 (link)
[10]: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1 (link)
[11]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006291X2100499X?via%3Dihub (link)
[12]: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902 (link)
[13]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827936/ (link)
[14]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33284859/ (link)
[15]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491447/ (link)
[16]: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JVI.00794-21 (link)
[17]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-021-01332-z (link)
[18]: https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf (link)
[19]: https://www.cas.org/resource/blog/understanding-nanotechnology-covid-19-vaccines (link)
[20]: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2021/06/30/science.abi7994 (link)
[21]: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198 (link)
[22]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95025-3 (link)
[23]: https://www.nature.com/articles/news050110-3#ref-CR1 (link)
[24]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8 (link)
[25]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32920233/ (link)
[26]: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.22.432407v1 (link)
[27]: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2004/12/sars-vaccine-linked-liver-damage-ferret-study (link)
[28]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15755610/ (link)
[29]: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421 (link)
[30]: https://jvi.asm.org/content/78/22/12672.abstract (link)
[31]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186 (link)
[32]: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext (link)
[33]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7K30MGvOs5s&ab_channel=TerryShaneyfelt (link)
[34]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16544518/ (link)
[35]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03777-9 (link)
[36]: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization (link)
[37]: https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Abstract/9000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx (link)
[38]: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1 (link)
[39]: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.26880 (link)
[40]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/ (link)
[41]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011 (link)
[42]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888155/ (link)
[43]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-020-0336- (link)
[44]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996102/ (link)
[45]: https://www.buongiornosuedtirol.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Nota-Journal-of-Biomedical-Research-Safety-and-Efficacy-Iota-Carrageenan-and-Ivermectin.pdf (link)
[46]: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712%2820%2932506-6/fulltext (link)
[47]: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10428194.2020.1786559 (link)
[48]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33180097/ (link)
[49]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33391730/ (link)
[50]: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.652688/full (link)
[51]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33403480/ (link)
[52]: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v2 (link)
[53]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03647-4 (link)
[54]: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01442-9 (link)
[55]: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.19.21255739v1 (link)
[56]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209951/pdf/RMV-9999-e2260.pdf (link)
[57]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Results_and_Analysis (link)
[58]: https://www.openvaers.com/openvaers (link)